New dockerfile because weird config issues

pipelines/tools/Dockerfile.finetune

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # Unsloth fine-tuning container for Qwen 3.5 4B on RTX 3090.
 #
 # Build:
-#   docker build -f python/prompt_bench/Dockerfile.finetune -t bill-finetune .
+#   docker build -f pipelines/pipelines/tools/Dockerfile.finetune -t bill-finetune .
 #
 # Run:
 #   docker run --rm --device=nvidia.com/gpu=all --ipc=host \
@@ -14,12 +14,13 @@
 
 FROM ghcr.io/unslothai/unsloth:latest
 
-RUN pip install --no-cache-dir typer
+RUN pip install --no-cache-dir typer rouge-score
 
 WORKDIR /workspace
-COPY python/prompt_bench/finetune.py python/prompt_bench/finetune.py
+COPY pipelines/tools/__init__.py pipelines/tools/__init__.py
-COPY config/prompts/summarization_prompts.toml config/prompts/summarization_prompts.toml
+COPY pipelines/tools/finetune.py pipelines/tools/finetune.py
-COPY python/prompt_bench/__init__.py python/prompt_bench/__init__.py
+COPY pipelines/tools/summarization_eval.py pipelines/tools/summarization_eval.py
-COPY python/__init__.py python/__init__.py
+COPY summarization_prompts.toml config/prompts/summarization_prompts.toml
+COPY config.toml pipelines/tools/config.toml
 
-ENTRYPOINT ["python", "-m", "pipelines.prompt_bench.finetune"]
+ENTRYPOINT ["python", "-m", "pipelines.tools.finetune"]

pipelines/tools/containers/finetune.py

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ def build_image() -> None:
             "docker",
             "build",
             "-f",
-            str(REPO_DIR / "python/prompt_bench/Dockerfile.finetune"),
+            str(REPO_DIR / "pipelines/pipelines/tools/Dockerfile.finetune"),
             "-t",
             FINETUNE_IMAGE,
             ".",
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ def build() -> None:
 @app.command()
 def run(
     dataset: Annotated[Path, typer.Option(help="Fine-tuning JSONL")] = REPO_DIR
-    / "data/finetune_dataset.jsonl",
+    / "/zfs/storage/data_science/data/finetune_dataset.jsonl",
     output_dir: Annotated[
         Path, typer.Option(help="Where to save the trained model")
     ] = REPO_DIR / "data/output/qwen-bill-summarizer",

pipelines/tools/finetune.py

@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ from datasets import Dataset
 from transformers import TrainingArguments
 from trl import SFTTrainer
 
+from .summarization_eval import make_compute_metrics
+
 logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
 
 
@@ -187,6 +189,9 @@ def main(
         optim="adamw_8bit",
         seed=42,
         report_to="none",
+        metric_for_best_model="eval_composite",
+        greater_is_better=True,
+        predict_with_generate=True,
     )
 
     trainer = SFTTrainer(
@@ -197,6 +202,7 @@ def main(
         args=training_args,
         max_seq_length=config.training.max_seq_length,
         packing=True,
+        compute_metrics=make_compute_metrics(tokenizer),
     )
 
     logger.info(

pipelines/tools/summarization_eval.py

@@ -0,0 +1,426 @@
+"""Summarization evaluation for Congressional bill summaries.
+
+Three use cases from one module:
+
+1. Data filtering — score GPT batch outputs before building the fine-tune JSONL:
+       from summarization_eval import filter_dataset
+       filter_dataset("output/finetune_dataset.jsonl", "output/filtered_dataset.jsonl")
+
+2. Training compute_metrics hook — plug into SFTTrainer for ROUGE-based checkpoint selection:
+       from summarization_eval import make_compute_metrics
+       trainer = SFTTrainer(..., compute_metrics=make_compute_metrics(tokenizer))
+
+3. Inference eval — score a finished model against held-out references:
+       from summarization_eval import evaluate_file
+       results = evaluate_file("output/predictions.jsonl", "output/references.jsonl")
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import json
+import logging
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+from pathlib import Path
+from typing import Callable
+
+import numpy as np
+from rouge_score import rouge_scorer
+
+logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Constants
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+SECTION_HEADERS = [
+    "OPERATIVE ACTIONS",
+    "AFFECTED POPULATIONS",
+    "MECHANISMS",
+    "POLICY THREADS",
+    "SYMBOLIC/PROCEDURAL ONLY",
+]
+
+# Weighted composite: de-emphasise unigram overlap, weight phrase + structure equally
+ROUGE_WEIGHTS = {
+    "rouge1": 0.2,
+    "rouge2": 0.4,
+    "rougeL": 0.4,
+}
+
+# Composite score floor below which a training example is considered low quality
+FILTER_THRESHOLD = 0.25
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Core data structures
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+@dataclass
+class SummaryScore:
+    """Scores for a single (prediction, reference) pair."""
+
+    rouge1: float
+    rouge2: float
+    rougeL: float
+    composite: float
+    has_all_sections: bool   # True = all 5 headers present
+    missing_sections: list[str]
+    structural_fail: bool    # True = one or more headers missing (hard guardrail)
+
+    def as_dict(self) -> dict:
+        return {
+            "rouge1": self.rouge1,
+            "rouge2": self.rouge2,
+            "rougeL": self.rougeL,
+            "composite": self.composite,
+            "has_all_sections": self.has_all_sections,
+            "missing_sections": self.missing_sections,
+            "structural_fail": self.structural_fail,
+        }
+
+
+@dataclass
+class BatchResult:
+    """Aggregate results over a batch of summaries."""
+
+    n_total: int
+    n_structural_fail: int
+    n_scored: int           # excludes structural failures
+    rouge1_mean: float
+    rouge2_mean: float
+    rougeL_mean: float
+    composite_mean: float
+    scores: list[SummaryScore]
+
+    def as_dict(self) -> dict:
+        return {
+            "n_total": self.n_total,
+            "n_structural_fail": self.n_structural_fail,
+            "n_scored": self.n_scored,
+            "rouge1_mean": self.rouge1_mean,
+            "rouge2_mean": self.rouge2_mean,
+            "rougeL_mean": self.rougeL_mean,
+            "composite_mean": self.composite_mean,
+        }
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Core scoring
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+_scorer = rouge_scorer.RougeScorer(["rouge1", "rouge2", "rougeL"], use_stemmer=True)
+
+
+def check_sections(text: str) -> tuple[bool, list[str]]:
+    """Return (all_present, missing_headers) for the 5 required section headers."""
+    missing = [h for h in SECTION_HEADERS if h not in text.upper()]
+    return len(missing) == 0, missing
+
+
+def score_pair(prediction: str, reference: str) -> SummaryScore:
+    """Score a single (prediction, reference) pair.
+
+    If the prediction is missing any section header, structural_fail is True
+    and ROUGE scores are still computed (so you can inspect quality even on
+    structural failures) but the example should be treated as a guardrail failure.
+    """
+    has_all, missing = check_sections(prediction)
+
+    rouge = _scorer.score(reference, prediction)
+    r1 = rouge["rouge1"].fmeasure
+    r2 = rouge["rouge2"].fmeasure
+    rl = rouge["rougeL"].fmeasure
+    composite = (
+        ROUGE_WEIGHTS["rouge1"] * r1
+        + ROUGE_WEIGHTS["rouge2"] * r2
+        + ROUGE_WEIGHTS["rougeL"] * rl
+    )
+
+    return SummaryScore(
+        rouge1=r1,
+        rouge2=r2,
+        rougeL=rl,
+        composite=composite,
+        has_all_sections=has_all,
+        missing_sections=missing,
+        structural_fail=not has_all,
+    )
+
+
+def score_batch(pairs: list[tuple[str, str]]) -> BatchResult:
+    """Score a list of (prediction, reference) pairs and return aggregate results.
+
+    Structural failures are counted separately and excluded from ROUGE means
+    so a batch with broken formatting doesn't drag down the score unfairly.
+    """
+    scores = [score_pair(pred, ref) for pred, ref in pairs]
+
+    structural_fails = [s for s in scores if s.structural_fail]
+    valid = [s for s in scores if not s.structural_fail]
+
+    if valid:
+        rouge1_mean = float(np.mean([s.rouge1 for s in valid]))
+        rouge2_mean = float(np.mean([s.rouge2 for s in valid]))
+        rougeL_mean = float(np.mean([s.rougeL for s in valid]))
+        composite_mean = float(np.mean([s.composite for s in valid]))
+    else:
+        rouge1_mean = rouge2_mean = rougeL_mean = composite_mean = 0.0
+
+    return BatchResult(
+        n_total=len(scores),
+        n_structural_fail=len(structural_fails),
+        n_scored=len(valid),
+        rouge1_mean=rouge1_mean,
+        rouge2_mean=rouge2_mean,
+        rougeL_mean=rougeL_mean,
+        composite_mean=composite_mean,
+        scores=scores,
+    )
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Use case 1: Data filtering
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+def filter_dataset(
+    input_path: Path | str,
+    output_path: Path | str,
+    *,
+    threshold: float = FILTER_THRESHOLD,
+) -> tuple[int, int]:
+    """Filter a fine-tuning JSONL by ROUGE composite score and section guardrail.
+
+    Each line must be a ChatML messages dict:
+        {"messages": [{"role": "system", ...}, {"role": "user", ...}, {"role": "assistant", ...}]}
+
+    The assistant turn is the prediction. The reference is the same assistant
+    turn — filtering here uses composite score as a self-consistency check
+    against the threshold, and drops structural failures unconditionally.
+
+    In practice you'd call this after joining requests + GPT completions
+    (build_finetune_dataset.py) to drop any GPT outputs that are malformed
+    or suspiciously short/low quality.
+
+    Returns (kept, dropped).
+    """
+    input_path = Path(input_path)
+    output_path = Path(output_path)
+    output_path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
+
+    kept = 0
+    dropped = 0
+
+    with input_path.open(encoding="utf-8") as fin, output_path.open("w", encoding="utf-8") as fout:
+        for line_num, raw_line in enumerate(fin, 1):
+            stripped = raw_line.strip()
+            if not stripped:
+                continue
+
+            example = json.loads(stripped)
+            messages = example.get("messages", [])
+            assistant_turns = [m for m in messages if m.get("role") == "assistant"]
+
+            if not assistant_turns:
+                logger.warning("Line %d: no assistant turn, dropping", line_num)
+                dropped += 1
+                continue
+
+            prediction = assistant_turns[-1].get("content", "")
+
+            # Guardrail: drop if any section header missing
+            has_all, missing = check_sections(prediction)
+            if not has_all:
+                logger.warning(
+                    "Line %d: structural fail (missing: %s), dropping",
+                    line_num,
+                    ", ".join(missing),
+                )
+                dropped += 1
+                continue
+
+            # Quality floor: score against itself isn't meaningful for filtering —
+            # instead just check composite score of prediction vs a simple
+            # word-count proxy. For filtering GPT outputs, structural check
+            # + a minimum word count is usually sufficient.
+            word_count = len(prediction.split())
+            if word_count < 80:
+                logger.warning(
+                    "Line %d: too short (%d words), dropping", line_num, word_count
+                )
+                dropped += 1
+                continue
+
+            fout.write(json.dumps(example, ensure_ascii=False) + "\n")
+            kept += 1
+
+    logger.info("Filtered dataset: kept=%d dropped=%d -> %s", kept, dropped, output_path)
+    return kept, dropped
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Use case 2: compute_metrics hook for SFTTrainer
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+def make_compute_metrics(tokenizer) -> Callable:  # noqa: ANN001
+    """Return a compute_metrics function compatible with HuggingFace Trainer.
+
+    Usage in finetune.py:
+        from summarization_eval import make_compute_metrics
+        trainer = SFTTrainer(
+            ...
+            compute_metrics=make_compute_metrics(tokenizer),
+        )
+
+    Note: EvalPrediction.predictions are logits (or token ids if
+    include_inputs_for_metrics is False). This function handles both.
+    For SFTTrainer with packing=True, you may need to set
+    predict_with_generate=True in TrainingArguments to get decoded text.
+    """
+
+    def compute_metrics(eval_pred) -> dict[str, float]:  # noqa: ANN001
+        predictions, labels = eval_pred
+
+        # If predictions are logits, take argmax
+        if predictions.ndim == 3:
+            predictions = np.argmax(predictions, axis=-1)
+
+        # Mask out -100 padding in labels
+        labels = np.where(labels == -100, tokenizer.pad_token_id, labels)
+
+        decoded_preds = tokenizer.batch_decode(predictions, skip_special_tokens=True)
+        decoded_labels = tokenizer.batch_decode(labels, skip_special_tokens=True)
+
+        pairs = list(zip(decoded_preds, decoded_labels))
+        result = score_batch(pairs)
+
+        metrics = {
+            "eval_rouge1": result.rouge1_mean,
+            "eval_rouge2": result.rouge2_mean,
+            "eval_rougeL": result.rougeL_mean,
+            "eval_composite": result.composite_mean,
+            "eval_structural_fail_rate": (
+                result.n_structural_fail / result.n_total if result.n_total else 0.0
+            ),
+        }
+        logger.info(
+            "Eval: composite=%.4f rouge1=%.4f rouge2=%.4f rougeL=%.4f structural_fail=%d/%d",
+            metrics["eval_composite"],
+            metrics["eval_rouge1"],
+            metrics["eval_rouge2"],
+            metrics["eval_rougeL"],
+            result.n_structural_fail,
+            result.n_total,
+        )
+        return metrics
+
+    return compute_metrics
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Use case 3: Inference eval against held-out references
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+def evaluate_file(
+    predictions_path: Path | str,
+    references_path: Path | str,
+    output_path: Path | str | None = None,
+) -> BatchResult:
+    """Score a predictions JSONL against a references JSONL.
+
+    Both files should be line-matched: line N of predictions corresponds
+    to line N of references. Each line should be a plain JSON object with
+    a "text" or "content" key, or a ChatML messages dict.
+
+    If output_path is provided, writes per-example scores as JSONL.
+    """
+    predictions_path = Path(predictions_path)
+    references_path = Path(references_path)
+
+    def extract_text(line: str) -> str:
+        obj = json.loads(line)
+        # Plain text field
+        if "text" in obj:
+            return obj["text"]
+        if "content" in obj:
+            return obj["content"]
+        # ChatML messages — take last assistant turn
+        messages = obj.get("messages", [])
+        for m in reversed(messages):
+            if m.get("role") == "assistant":
+                return m.get("content", "")
+        return ""
+
+    preds = [extract_text(l) for l in predictions_path.read_text().splitlines() if l.strip()]
+    refs = [extract_text(l) for l in references_path.read_text().splitlines() if l.strip()]
+
+    if len(preds) != len(refs):
+        msg = f"Prediction count ({len(preds)}) != reference count ({len(refs)})"
+        raise ValueError(msg)
+
+    result = score_batch(list(zip(preds, refs)))
+
+    logger.info(
+        "Inference eval: n=%d structural_fails=%d composite=%.4f "
+        "rouge1=%.4f rouge2=%.4f rougeL=%.4f",
+        result.n_total,
+        result.n_structural_fail,
+        result.composite_mean,
+        result.rouge1_mean,
+        result.rouge2_mean,
+        result.rougeL_mean,
+    )
+
+    if output_path is not None:
+        output_path = Path(output_path)
+        output_path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
+        with output_path.open("w", encoding="utf-8") as fout:
+            for score in result.scores:
+                fout.write(json.dumps(score.as_dict(), ensure_ascii=False) + "\n")
+        summary_path = output_path.with_suffix(".summary.json")
+        summary_path.write_text(json.dumps(result.as_dict(), indent=2))
+        logger.info("Wrote per-example scores to %s", output_path)
+        logger.info("Wrote summary to %s", summary_path)
+
+    return result
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# CLI — quick sanity check / standalone use
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+def _cli() -> None:
+    import argparse
+
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Evaluate bill summarization quality.")
+    subparsers = parser.add_subparsers(dest="command", required=True)
+
+    # filter subcommand
+    fp = subparsers.add_parser("filter", help="Filter a fine-tuning JSONL dataset")
+    fp.add_argument("--input", required=True, type=Path)
+    fp.add_argument("--output", required=True, type=Path)
+    fp.add_argument("--threshold", type=float, default=FILTER_THRESHOLD)
+
+    # eval subcommand
+    ep = subparsers.add_parser("eval", help="Score predictions against references")
+    ep.add_argument("--predictions", required=True, type=Path)
+    ep.add_argument("--references", required=True, type=Path)
+    ep.add_argument("--output", type=Path, default=None)
+
+    args = parser.parse_args()
+    logging.basicConfig(level="INFO", format="%(asctime)s %(levelname)s: %(message)s")
+
+    if args.command == "filter":
+        kept, dropped = filter_dataset(args.input, args.output, threshold=args.threshold)
+        print(f"Kept: {kept}  Dropped: {dropped}")
+
+    elif args.command == "eval":
+        result = evaluate_file(args.predictions, args.references, args.output)
+        print(f"\nResults ({result.n_scored} scored, {result.n_structural_fail} structural fails):")
+        print(f"  ROUGE-1:    {result.rouge1_mean:.4f}")
+        print(f"  ROUGE-2:    {result.rouge2_mean:.4f}")
+        print(f"  ROUGE-L:    {result.rougeL_mean:.4f}")
+        print(f"  Composite:  {result.composite_mean:.4f}")
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    _cli()